High Conviction Fund
The High Conviction Fund (Fund) delivered a 5.7% return (net of fees) for the 12 months to December 31, 2025, with stock selection supporting performance amidst a challenging market backdrop for our fundamentally driven, ethical investment style. The first half of the year was characterised by persistent market flows concentrated into companies with large index weights (e.g. the Big 4 banks) despite elevated valuation multiples, while gold stocks rallied strongly as the gold price strengthened on heightened macro uncertainty. As the year progressed, growing confidence in the market outlook saw a broadening of risk appetite into stocks with relative valuation appeal and new IPOs coming to market, while the rally in gold stocks broadened into a rally across the Materials sector on strengthening commodity prices.
Sector allocation created an unfavourable headwind for the portfolio in 2025, which underperformed the ASX 300 benchmark with a 10.7% return. The carbon intensive Materials sector was a significant driver of the benchmark’s return, rising 36% over the year. The Fund has a material underweight position in the Materials sector relative to the benchmark due to the high carbon intensity of the mining companies that dominate the sector. Conversely, the Fund has an overweight position in long-term thematic growth sectors, Healthcare and Information Technology, which were the two sector laggards of the market in 2025. Whilst these sector positions detracted from performance over the year, they have added significantly more value than the Materials sector, as well as the broader market over the 30+ years we have been managing Australian equities1.
The Fund’s investment focus remained on leveraging our team’s fundamental research capability to find attractively priced companies within our ethical investment universe, that will outperform over time. Pleasingly, this process delivered positive contribution from stock selection during the year. This was most evident in the Financials sector, which the Fund maintains an underweight position in relative to the benchmark, yet was the best performing sector for the Fund during the year. Stocks with strong valuation appeal, including Challenger and NIB, were some of the best performers for the Fund. Reflecting our long-term investment horizon, we also maintained positions in out-of-favour stocks like Pilbara Minerals and Domain. This approach benefited the portfolio, as the lithium market roared to life in the second half of the year, while Domain became the subject of an attractive takeover offer.
As we head into 2026, the portfolio is well positioned to benefit from normalising macro conditions and a more balanced market. The focus for the Fund remains on finding stocks that are undervalued in the Australian or New Zealand markets, with our team of experienced analysts unearthing opportunities in the market.
High Conviction (Wholesale) Fund Performance (with performance fee)
As at 31 December 2025*
| fund | benchmark^ | |
|---|---|---|
| 3 months | -3.5% | -0.9% |
| 6 months | 2.0% | 4.1% |
| 1 year | 5.7% | 10.7% |
| 3 Years p.a. | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| Since inception p.a. | 3.6% | 8.0% |
^Benchmark is the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index.
*Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Inception date: 01/10/2021.
Contributors and detractors
Top 3 contributors to Fund return
+92.7%
PLS Group (PLS)
+63.7%
Challenger (CGF)
+72.6%
Domain Holdings Australia Ltd. (DHG)
Top 3 detractors from Fund return
-37.5%
CSL (CSL)
-71.6%
Nuix (NXL)
-21.8%
Reliance Worldwide (RWC)Contributors
- PLS Group (PLS) returned 93% over the year as spodumene prices rebounded strongly over the second half of the period, as demand continues to grow steadily on a curtailed supply base. While further near-term price movements are difficult to predict, PLS is strongly positioned with a Tier 1 asset, strong balance sheet with an approximate $850M cash balance, and relatively favourable position on the cost curve. In addition, we remain positive on the longer-term demand/supply fundamentals of the nascent lithium industry, and our investment in PLS is well placed to benefit and realise further upside from current levels.
- Challenger (CGF) remains a key player in Australia’s retirement income market, offering guaranteed annuity products that require significant capital backing. In November, APRA proposed changes to capital requirements for annuity providers, allowing them to hold less capital. The objective is to encourage competition and increase adoption of retirement income solutions across the market. CGF’s return on equity should improve from holding less capital. Dai-ichi Life became a major shareholder (holding a 19.9% stake in July this year), reinforcing confidence in Challenger’s long-term strategy.
- Domain Holdings (DHG) was acquired by CoStar for $4.43 per share, a significant premium to the pre-bid price in August 2025 following approval of the transaction by shareholders.
Detractors
- CSL (CSL) nderperformed during the year, driven by a softer FY26 outlook, ongoing uncertainty surrounding US regulatory impacts and lower vaccination rates in the US. Despite this, the long-term investment thesis remains intact, supported by sustained global demand for plasma-derived therapies. The stock continues to trade at an attractive discount to all industrials (excluding banks and REITs), while targeting high-single-digits EPS growth p.a. over the mid-term.
- Nuix (NXL) experienced significant share price volatility during the year following slippage on the timing of signing enterprise deals and the unexpected departure of the CEO. We view the current valuation as attractive with a pathway to restoring double digit annual contract value growth over the medium term. The acquisition of Linkurious, a French graph‑data analytics business, is complementary to Nuix’s offering and provides additional cross‑sell opportunities.
- Reliance Worldwide's (RWC) share price underperformed the market during the period, impacted by US tariffs headwinds and ongoing softness in residential activity and end market demand, particularly in the US and UK. While the cost of tariffs will have a US$25-$30m impact during the current financial year, management have implemented mitigation measures, such as price increases and product sourcing changes to minimise the impact going forward. Reliance is a high quality, well-managed company with a strong balance sheet trading at an attractive valuation. We expect upside to emerge over the medium term.
A strong rally in the gold price drove gold miners higher, a headwind for the portfolio given our natural underweight position to these companies. It was pleasing to outperform the broader market despite this market dynamic.
Portfolio changes
Additions to the Fund
- Xero Limited (XRO) is a global cloud based accounting and payments software business with a market-leading position in A&NZ and a solid growth trajectory in the UK and US. The indigestion from the acquisition of the US payments business Melio had created a longterm buying opportunity for a high-quality software business in our view.
Divestments from the Fund
- Orora Limited (ORA) is a manufacturer of packaging solutions for beverage products, operating in Australia, Europe and the US. ORA has faced a challenging operating environment with a downturn in glass volumes impacting its Saverglass business, compounded by uncertainty over the potential impact of tariffs. While P/E valuation metrics appear cheap, the timing and quantum of volume improvements remains uncertain. The position was exited to reinvest the capital in other high conviction opportunities where we see a greater upside in the near term.
- Australian Clinical Labs (ACL) runs an extensive pathology services network in Australia. Near-term uncertainty is present due to regulatory and competitive pressures. The divestment frees capital to pursue opportunities in other sectors with better growth potential.
Additions/reductions are for the most recent quarter
We added global cloud based accounting and payments software business Xero to the fund. We believe the indigestion of the acquisition of US payments business Melio had created a long-term buying opportunity for a high-quality software business.
Sector allocation
Sector overweights
Communication Services, Consumer Staples, Health Care, Information Technology, Utilities (renewables)
Sector underweights
Consumer Discretionary, Energy, Financials, Materials
The Financials sector was the best performing sector for the Fund during the year even though we maintain an underweight position in relative to the benchmark. Stocks with strong valuation appeal including Challenger and NIB were some of the best performers for the Fund.
1 Since September 1994, the Information Technology GICs (Global Industry Classification Standard) sector has returned 19.2% per annum. This is almost twice as much as the Materials GICs (+9.7%) and three times more than Energy GICs (6.32%) in this period.
Interests in Australian Ethical Managed Funds are issued by Australian Ethical Investment Ltd (ABN 47 003 188 930, AFSL 229949) the Responsible Entity of the Australian Ethical Managed Funds.
The information is of a general nature and is not intended to provide you with financial advice or take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the information, consider its appropriateness to your circumstances and read the Financial Services Guide, relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD) available on our website. You may wish to seek financial advice from an authorised tax or financial adviser before making an investment decision. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Investing ethically and sustainably means that the investment universe will generally be more limited than non-ethical, non-sustainable portfolios in similar asset classes. This means that the portfolio(s) may not have exposure to specific assets which over or underperform over the investment cycle, and so the returns and volatility of the portfolio(s) may be higher or lower than non-ethical, non-sustainable portfolios over all investment time frames.
*Total returns are calculated using the sell (exit) price, net of management fees and gross of tax as if distributions of income have been reinvested at the actual distribution reinvestment price. The actual returns received by an investor will depend on the timing, buy and exit prices of individual transactions. Return of capital and the performance of your investment in the fund are not guaranteed. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Figures showing a period of less than one year have not been adjusted to show an annual total return. Figures for periods of greater than one year are on a per annum compound basis. The current benchmark may not have been the benchmark over all periods shown in the above chart and tables. The calculation of the benchmark performance links the performance of previous benchmarks and the current benchmark over the relevant time periods.
This commentary may contain material provided by third parties derived from sources believed to be accurate at its issue date. While such material is published with necessary permission, Australian Ethical accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of, nor does it endorse any such third party material. To the maximum extent permitted by law, we intend by this notice to exclude liability for this third-party material.
The information contained in this document is believed to be accurate at the time of compilation.

