Skip to main content

Multi-Asset Funds

Portfolio performance and outlook commentary for the 12 months to 30 June 2026.
Published 17 Jul 2026   |   6 min read

Performance across all Multi-Asset Funds (‘Funds’) was positive for the financial year on an absolute basis, and all but the Conservative Fund underperformed their respective benchmarks. International Equities was the main driver of absolute returns thanks to stand-out performance from the Information Technology (IT) sector (up 30%). Domestic Equities detracted value due to the Funds’ natural underweighting to the Materials sector (which outperformed the broader Australian equities index) and overweighting to IT and Healthcare sectors (which underperformed the index), in line with our Ethical Charter. The Funds all finished the financial year with a strong June quarter, all comfortably outperforming their benchmarks.

In local currency terms, Global Equity markets delivered their fourth straight year of double-digit growth (MSCI ACWI +25.5%). This was despite both a broad sell-off in the software sector in February, and the US-Iran conflict triggering a dip in markets over February and March, only to fully recover by mid-April and to finish the financial year at all-time highs. Much was to do with the continued enthusiasm for Artificial Intelligence (AI), which saw memory- and semiconductor-heavy equity markets, such as Korean and Taiwanese return triple-digit growth (MSCI Korea +260%, MSCI Taiwan +124%), alongside US IT companies such as Micron Technologies and Intel, up +787% and +490%, respectively. The Funds’ own International Equity holdings saw outperformance against its asset class benchmark – benefiting not only from AI related Technology Hardware names likes TSMC (+101%), but thanks to positioning in US Healthcare names, like Merck and Co (+57.2%), maker of prescription medicines, such as Keytuda (cancer treatment) and Gardasil (HPV vaccine), as well as the world largest battery manufacturer CATL (+105%).

Conversely, the Domestic Equities market lagged its international counterparts, with the S&P/ ASX 300 returning +6.2%. This was partially due to several blue-chip names falling out of favour with the market, such as CSL, CBA and Xero all printing negative absolute returns for the financial year. The Funds’ stock selection was able to avoid some of these underperformers, however, the defining thematic of the financial year was the rotation into the Materials sector. The raw materials needed to fuel the AI build-out, and the broader green electrification transformation saw commodities prices (and the share prices of those that extract it) rise over the year. The Funds did manage to benefit from some of this price rise through holdings in companies such as PLS Group and IGO, both of which extract the critical minerals, like lithium, needed to power electric vehicles and battery storage. However, the Funds typical underweight to Materials more broadly due to ethical considerations (with no investment in BHP and RIO, the largest Materials names), seeing its Domestic Equities portfolio return -3.75% for the financial year.

In Fixed Income markets, most central banks continued to loosen monetary policy in the first half of the financial year, only to be met with another supply-driven inflation episode in the second half, due to higher oil prices. For economies which still had lingering inflationary concerns or were highly dependent on imported oil, such as Australia, Japan, and Europe, the event catalyzed rate hikes, while other economies took a more wait-and-see approach. However, in general this saw most long end bond yields climb higher to end the year, though credit spreads continued to remain resilient and ended the year tighter than where they started. As a result, the Funds’ own Fixed Income portfolio was fairly in line with its asset class benchmark and delivered positive returns.

Outlook

While growth in AI has been a dominant theme for FY26, the key question for markets in the period ahead is whether the current level of business growth and capital expenditure by hyperscalers can be sustained. The ripple effects of this investment cycle have extended well beyond technology, supporting demand for semiconductors, data center infrastructure, power generation (including renewables), critical minerals and industrial supply chains. Should investment intentions moderate, we would expect the impact to be felt across a broad range of companies and sectors. At the same time, we remain mindful of the risk of becoming underexposed to a structural growth driver that continues to transform the global economy. We remain focused on maintaining appropriate exposure to this structural growth theme without compromising valuation discipline. Recent transactions in unlisted assets have provided opportunities to gain diversified exposure to a range of AI beneficiaries at attractive valuations relative to underlying asset values.

Risks remain abundant, and relatively high interest rates we observe globally are generally a headwind for risk assets, particularly if the exceptional earnings growth we have seen begins to moderate. In this environment, the Funds' increasingly diversified exposure across asset classes, active management of duration within fixed income, and allocation to CPI-linked infrastructure assets should help provide some resilience, with revenues that can adjust alongside inflation and cash flows that are typically less sensitive to economic cycles.

 

Multi-Asset Funds (Wholesale): Performance vs benchmark*

Since inception (% P.A.) 5 years (% P.A.) 3 years (% P.A.) 1 year (%) 3 months (%)
Balanced (Wholesale) 7.6 5.6 8.5 6.4 6.7
Benchmark^ 7.9 6.9 9.8 8.5 5.6
Alpha -0.3 -1.4 -1.2 -2.1 1.1
High Growth (Wholesale) 11.3 7.2 10.5 7.2 8.3
Benchmark^ 11.2 9.3 12.6 10.3 6.9
Alpha 0.1 -2.1 -2.1 -3.1 1.4
Moderate (Wholesale) 10.1 - - 6.0 5.3
Benchmark^ 10.2 - - 7.0 4.4
Alpha -0.1 - - -1.0 0.9
Conservative (Wholesale) 6.9 - - 5.7 4.1
Benchmark^ 6.5 - - 5.4 3.3
Alpha 0.4 - - 0.3 0.8

*All returns are net of fees for the Wholesale option. Find more information on these funds via the managed funds page including Retail performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

^ Benchmark: SAA Weighted Index.  

- Balanced Fund SAA Weighted Benchmark changed from Morningstar Multi-sector Balanced to SAA Weighted Benchmark from 1 Sep 2012. The historical benchmark returns are calculated by linking indices.

- High Growth SAA Weighted Benchmark changed from 75% S&P/ASX 200/25% MSCI World ex Australia to SAA Weighted Benchmark from 1 October 2021. Previously, benchmark changed from S&P ASX 200 to 75% S&P/ASX 200 Industrials/25% MSCI Global Climate from 29 August 2013, then to 75% S&P/ASX 200 Industrials/25% MSCI World ex Australia from 1 July 2016, then to 75% S&P/ASX 200/25% MSCI World ex Australia from 13 August 2019. The historical benchmark returns are calculated by linking indices.

Contributors and detractors

Top 3 asset classes

+17.0%

International Equity

+29.7%

Growth Alternatives

+6.1%

Property



Bottom 3 asset classes

+2.7%

International Fixed Interest

+1.7%

Domestic Fixed Interest

-3.8%

Domestic Equity

Contributors

  • International Equity – On a weighted-basis, the Funds’ holdings in well-known US Information Technology and Communication Services companies contributed the majority of absolute performance, such as Alphabet (+92.2%), Micron Technologies (+787%), and Apple (+33.8%), thanks to the continued momentum of AI. However, on a relative-basis, the Funds’ positioning in lesser-known companies tied to the AI ecosystem, such as Lam Research Corporation (+323%) and NGK Corp (+257%), allowed it to outperform its asset class benchmark.

  • Growth Alternatives – Strong performance was driven by an unlisted infrastructure co-investment which saw a significant revaluation up following the recapitalisation of a previously underperforming infrastructure asset.

  • Property – Performance improved as the property sector continued to stabilise following a period of valuation adjustment driven by higher interest rates. Renewed confidence in asset values and a gradual recovery in transaction activity provided support to returns.

Detractors

  • Domestic Equity – The Funds’ lack of meaningful exposure to Materials companies, as well as overweight to underperforming Information Technology companies, such as Xero and PEXA, as well as Healthcare names, such as CSL and Cochlear, saw both negative absolute and relative performance within the Domestic Equity portfolio.


Data centres representing investment in AI

While AI continued to drive absolute performance, positioning in lesser-known companies tied to the AI ecosystem, including Lam Research and NGK Corp, drove outperform to the asset class benchmark

 


Portfolio changes

Additions to the Funds

  • Octopus Australia Sustainable Investments Fund – An unlisted infrastructure fund investment focused on providing investors with exposure to a diversified portfolio of Australian clean energy infrastructure assets through its investment in development, construction and operational renewable energy projects.

  • Ellerston Capital 2050 Fund – A growth-oriented investment strategy providing exposure to a diversified portfolio of private and listed companies benefiting from long-term structural growth themes spanning electrification, artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure.

  • Xspansiv – A leading global technology and market infrastructure provider for environmental commodities, operating platforms that facilitate the trading, registration, management and monetisation of carbon credits, renewable energy certificates, clean fuels and other energy transition assets across more than 60 countries.


Reductions from the Funds

  • Copper – During the period, we realised gains and exited our copper position following a period of strong performance. While we continue to see attractive long-term demand drivers for copper, we believed prevailing prices were discounting an overly optimistic outlook for the commodity. 

  • European Carbon (EU ETS) – We exited our position in European Carbon (EU ETS) during the quarter. Increasing regulatory uncertainty as European policymakers seek to balance decarbonisation objectives with energy security concerns reduced our conviction in the long-term investment case. This was a disappointing outcome from a systems perspective, given the European carbon market has historically been one of the strongest and most durable carbon pricing frameworks globally, even as support for climate-focused policies has softened elsewhere. 
     
     

Multi road overpass with bridge crossings

During the period, we realised gains and exited our copper position following a period of strong performance. While we continue to see attractive long-term demand drivers for copper, we believed prevailing prices were discounting an overly optimistic outlook for the commodity.

 

While growth in AI has been a dominant theme for FY26, the key question for markets in the period ahead is whether the current level of business growth and capital expenditure by hyperscalers can be sustained.

 

 

Interests in Australian Ethical Managed Funds are issued by Australian Ethical Investment Ltd (ABN 47 003 188 930, AFSL 229949) the Responsible Entity of the Australian Ethical Managed Funds.

The information is of a general nature and is not intended to provide you with financial advice or take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the information, consider its appropriateness to your circumstances and read the Financial Services Guide, relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD) available on our website.

You may wish to seek financial advice from an authorised tax or financial adviser before making an investment decision. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. 

Investing ethically and sustainably means that the investment universe will generally be more limited than non-ethical, non-sustainable portfolios in similar asset classes. This means that the portfolio(s) may not have exposure to specific assets which over or underperform over the investment cycle, and so the returns and volatility of the portfolio(s) may be higher or lower than non-ethical, non-sustainable portfolios over all investment time frames.

*Total returns are calculated using the sell (exit) price, net of management fees and gross of tax as if distributions of income have been reinvested at the actual distribution reinvestment price. The actual returns received by an investor will depend on the timing, buy and exit prices of individual transactions. Return of capital and the performance of your investment in the fund are not guaranteed. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Figures showing a period of less than one year have not been adjusted to show an annual total return. Figures for periods of greater than one year are on a per annum compound basis. The current benchmark may not have been the benchmark over all periods shown in the above chart and tables. The calculation of the benchmark performance links the performance of previous benchmarks and the current benchmark over the relevant time periods.

This commentary may contain material provided by third parties derived from sources believed to be accurate at its issue date. While such material is published with necessary permission, Australian Ethical accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of, nor does it endorse any such third party material. To the maximum extent permitted by law, we intend by this notice to exclude liability for this third party material.

The information contained in this document is believed to be accurate at the time of compilation.